Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844946›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

The Economic Impact of a Pilot Digital Day-Case Pathway for Knee Arthroplasty in a U.K. Setting.

D M Cooper, N Bhuskute, C Hepworth, G Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D M CooperCentre for Health Social Care, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-729X
N BhuskuteCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-409X
C HepworthB. Braun Medical Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-8567
G WalshCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3249-3404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knee replacements are an increasingly common procedure in the U.K. National Health Service (NHS). Importantly, the pathway for such procedures represents a prime opportunity to leverage digital technology, modernize and streamline the approach to care, and free up resources. Methods: In this 21-patient pilot study, we assessed the impact of implementing a digital day-case pathway for knee replacement surgery at the Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation trust. Results: Fourteen (67%) of the 21 eligible patients were treated as day cases, with an average length of stay of 8.8 hours. The pilot data were utilized to model the potential impact of implementing a digital day-case program more widely across the trust. This model showed increased efficiency over the entire episode of care, with reductions in physiotherapy appointments, preoperative visits, hospital days, and face-to-face consultations. Not only would these improvements free up capacity, but they would also result in an estimated saving of £240,540 to the trust while reducing the CO Conclusions: Overall, the present study supports the growing notion that digital technology can facilitate the transformation of care pathways, resulting in greater efficiency and financial savings for health-care providers while reducing the time patients spend in the hospital. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Indexed as

digitisationeconomicsknee replacementsphysio-therapyrehabilitationremote monitoringself-care

Identifiers

PMID36844946
PMCPMC9949824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.