Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844912›Full record

ArticleVienna yearbook of population research2022

Cognitive schemas and fertility motivations in the U.S. during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Wendy D Manning, Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Monica A Longmore, Peggy C Giordano

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vienna yearbook of population research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Childbearing attitudes amid successive novel infectious disease epidemics: a mixed-method experimental approach.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2026
    Article
  2. Women's Reproductive Health Conditions and Fertility Goals.Population research and policy review · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perceptions of the Future and Pregnancy Avoidance in the U.S.Population research and policy review · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fertility in a Pandemic: Evidence from California.Population and development review · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Family Life Courses, Uncertain Futures, and the Changing World of Work: State-of-the-Art and Prospects.European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The agency of fertility plans.Frontiers in sociology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wendy D ManningDepartment of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-7380
Karen Benjamin GuzzoDepartment of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9718-8465
Monica A LongmoreDepartment of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8368-8928
Peggy C GiordanoDepartment of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2484-0886
Bowling Green State University · US

Funding

Research Development CoreR24HD050959 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BALISTRERI, KELLY STAMPER · 2005 to 2016
$2.6M
Computing and Data CoreP2CHD050959 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN L. · 2016 to 2021
$1.2M
U.S. Fertility and the Pandemic: Changing Fertility Plans in an Era of Uncertainty and StressR03HD105848 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MANNING, WENDY D. · 2021 to 2022
$142k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050959NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD105848NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While current evidence indicates that the United States did not experience a baby boom during the pandemic, few empirical studies have considered the underlying rationale for the American baby bust. Relying on data collected during the pandemic (

Indexed as

fertility expectationspandemicsubjective appraisals

Identifiers

PMID36844912
PMCPMC9949748
OpenAlexW4225693699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.