Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844886›Full record

ArticleArtificial intelligence review2023

Impact of word embedding models on text analytics in deep learning environment: a review.

Deepak Suresh Asudani, Naresh Kumar Nagwani, Pradeep Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Artificial intelligence review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deepak Suresh AsudaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh India.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-2293
Naresh Kumar NagwaniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh India.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-5818
Pradeep SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh India.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-8432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of word embedding and deep learning models for better outcomes is vital. Word embeddings are an n-dimensional distributed representation of a text that attempts to capture the meanings of the words. Deep learning models utilize multiple computing layers to learn hierarchical representations of data. The word embedding technique represented by deep learning has received much attention. It is used in various natural language processing (NLP) applications, such as text classification, sentiment analysis, named entity recognition, topic modeling, etc. This paper reviews the representative methods of the most prominent word embedding and deep learning models. It presents an overview of recent research trends in NLP and a detailed understanding of how to use these models to achieve efficient results on text analytics tasks. The review summarizes, contrasts, and compares numerous word embedding and deep learning models and includes a list of prominent datasets, tools, APIs, and popular publications. A reference for selecting a suitable word embedding and deep learning approach is presented based on a comparative analysis of different techniques to perform text analytics tasks. This paper can serve as a quick reference for learning the basics, benefits, and challenges of various word representation approaches and deep learning models, with their application to text analytics and a future outlook on research. It can be concluded from the findings of this study that domain-specific word embedding and the long short term memory model can be employed to improve overall text analytics task performance.

Indexed as

Deep learningNatural language processingText analyticsWord embedding

Identifiers

PMID36844886
PMCPMC9944441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.