Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844863›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in rural communities: A case study in engaging trusted messengers to pivot and plan.

Melhaney Reichelt, John Patrick Cullen, Sara Mayer-Fried, Holly Ann Russell, Nancy M Bennett, Reza Yousefi-Nooraie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melhaney ReicheltDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
John Patrick CullenClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Sara Mayer-FriedCenter for Community Health and Prevention, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.
Holly Ann RussellCenter for Community Health and Prevention, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States.
Nancy M BennettClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Reza Yousefi-NooraieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.

Funding

SIP22-003: Improving and evaluating measures to identify tics and tic disorders including Tourette syndrome in children in epidemiologic studies and clinic settingsU48DP006394 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BARNETT, STEVEN L · 2018 to 2023
$4.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic declaration of COVID-19 in 2020 presented unique challenges, lessons, and opportunities for public health practice in the United States. Despite clear evidence of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, vaccine uptake and vaccine confidence remained low in many regions. Vaccine holdouts, or those who are vaccine hesitant, have been an increasingly difficult population to reach. Several factors influence vaccine hesitancy and behavior in rural areas, including health care access challenges, misinformation, political loyalties, and concerns regarding the perceived lack of trustworthy evidence and knowledge of long-term effects. In March 2021, the Finger Lakes Rural Immunization Initiative (FLRII) engaged stakeholders to address vaccine hesitancy in a nine-county region of rural New York known as the Finger Lakes. Driven by data collected from community partners, physicians, and local health departments regarding their biggest barriers and greatest needs, the FLRII team created an interactive program for trusted messengers (TMs) including a stakeholder panel, called the Trusted Messenger Forum (TMF). The TMF met every 2 weeks from August 2021- August 2022 to engage local TMs and disseminate up-to-date knowledge in real time. During forum sessions, TMs shared detailed accounts of their experiences combating vaccine hesitancy in their communities and supported one another in their efforts through positive interaction and reaffirming conversations. Collaborations between community stakeholders can form a scaffolding to support a rapid response to a variety of public health problems and result in impactful change. For researchers implementing community-based research projects, modeling stakeholder panels after trusted messenger forums can be effective for diversifying the scope of the project and reacting to emergent problems in real-time.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansRural PopulationTrustVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinescommunicationcommunity-engagementCOVID-19rural healthtrusted messengersvaccine confidence

Identifiers

PMID36844863
PMCPMC9947642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.