ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Does environmental regulation improve residents' health? Evidence from China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Does public spending on sports improve people's health? Empirical evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Dynamic reward-penalty incentives and occupational health governance: an evolutionary game analysis with public health implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The impact of agricultural technological innovation on residents' health and its spatial effects.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Study on the impact of central environmental protection inspection on the health of the older adult population-A quasi-natural experiment in China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Legislative and judicial responses to public health protection under eco-environmental damage relief in China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental pollution is an important factor that harms public health, and environmental regulation is the policy instrument to govern pollution, so what impact does environmental regulation have on the public health? What are the mechanisms? To answer these questions, this paper constructs ologit model and uses China General Social Survey data for empirical analysis. The study found first that environmental regulation has a significant effect on improving the health level of residents, and this effect has been increasing with the passage of time. Second, the impact of environmental regulation on residents' health is different among residents with different characteristics. Specifically, the positive impact of environmental regulation on residents' health is stronger among residents with at least a university degree, residents with urban-registered residences, and residents living in economically developed areas. Third, the mechanism analysis found that environmental regulation can improve residents' health by reducing pollutant emissions and improving environmental quality. Finally, by introducing a cost benefit model, it was found that environmental regulation has a significant effect on improving the welfare level of individual residents and society as a whole. Hence, Environmental regulation is an effective means to improve residents' health, but when implementing environmental regulation, we should also pay attention to its negative impact on residents' employment and income.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.