Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844808›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

The ties that bind the sagebrush biome: integrating genetic connectivity into range-wide conservation of greater sage-grouse.

Todd B Cross, Jason D Tack, David E Naugle, Michael K Schwartz, Kevin E Doherty, Sara J Oyler-McCance, Ronald D Pritchert, Bradley C Fedy

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Todd B CrossSchool of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8561-0427
Jason D TackHabitat and Population Evaluation Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT, USA.
David E NaugleW.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Michael K SchwartzUSDA Forest Service, National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 East Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT, USA.
Kevin E DohertyUS Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood, CO, USA.
Sara J Oyler-McCanceFort Collins Science Center, US Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Ronald D PritchertHabitat and Population Evaluation Team, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 3425 Miriam Avenue, Bismarck, ND, USA.
Bradley C FedySchool of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conserving genetic connectivity is fundamental to species persistence, yet rarely is made actionable into spatial planning for imperilled species. Climate change and habitat degradation have added urgency to embrace connectivity into networks of protected areas. Our two-step process integrates a network model with a functional connectivity model, to identify population centres important to maintaining genetic connectivity then to delineate those pathways most likely to facilitate connectivity thereamong for the greater sage-grouse (

Indexed as

conservation prioritizationfunctional connectivitylandscape resistancenetwork modelreserve designspatial action maps

Identifiers

PMID36844808
PMCPMC9943888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.