ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023
Validation and implementation of Aperio LV1 remote live view telepathology system for intraoperative frozen section diagnosis.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Telepathology (TP) allows for remote slide review with performance comparable to traditional light microscopy. Use of TP in the intraoperative setting allows for faster turnaround and greater user convenience by obviating the physical presence of the attending pathologist. We sought to perform a practical validation of an intraoperative TP system using the Leica Aperio LV1 scanner in tandem with Zoom teleconferencing software. Methods: A validation was performed in accordance with recommendations from CAP/ASCP, using a retrospectively identified sample of surgical pathology cases with a 1 year washout period. Only cases with frozen-final concordance were included. Validators underwent training in the operation of the instrument and conferencing interface, then reviewed the blinded slide set annotated with clinical information. Validator diagnoses were compared to original diagnoses for concordance. Results: 60 slides were chosen for inclusion. 8 validators completed the slide review, each requiring 2 h. The validation was completed in 2 weeks. Overall concordance was 96.4%. Intraobserver concordance was 97.3%. No major technical hurdles were encountered. Conclusion: Validation of the intraoperative TP system was completed rapidly and with high concordance, comparable to traditional light microscopy. Institutional teleconferencing implementation driven by the COVID pandemic facilitated ease of adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.