ArticleOncology letters2023
Surgical restaging of patients with early‑stage endometrial cancer with lymphovascular invasion does not significantly impact their survival outcomes.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer: a fifteen-year retrospective Chinese cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is considered to be a poor prognostic factor in endometrial cancer. However, management of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer with positive LVSI remains controversial. The main objective of the present study was to investigate whether surgical restaging of such patients has a significant effect on survival outcomes or may be otherwise omitted. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Insitut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France for the period January 2003-December 2019. The present study included patients with definitive histopathological diagnosis of early-stage, grade 1-2 endometrial cancer with positive LVSI. Patients were divided into two groups: Those being restaged with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (group 1) and those not restaged and receiving complementary therapy (group 2). The primary outcomes of the study were overall survival and progression-free survival. Epidemiological data, clinical and histopathological characteristics as well as complementary treatment received were also studied. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed. Data from 30 patients were retrieved, of which restaging with lymphadenectomy was performed in 21 patients (group 1), while another 9 patients (group 2) were not restaged and received complementary therapy. Lymph node metastasis was observed in 23.8% of patients in group 1 (n=5). No significant difference was observed between groups 1 and 2 in terms of survival outcomes. The median overall survival was 91.31 months in group 1 and 90.61 months in group 2 [hazard ratio (HR), 0.71; 95% CI, 0.03-16.58; P=0.829]. The median disease-free survival was 87.95 months in group 1 and 81.52 months in group 2 (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.12-5.91; P=0.869). In conclusion, restaging with lymphadenectomy did not alter prognosis of early-stage, LVSI-positive patients. As there was no clinical and therapeutic benefit, restaging with lymphadenectomy could be omitted in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.