ArticleOncology letters2023
Prognostic and diagnostic significance of preoperative Jumonji domain‑containing 6 antibodies in colorectal cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor antigen-associated autoantibodies: generation mechanisms, roles in tumorigenesis and progression, and clinical application prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- JMJD6 Autoantibodies as a Potential Biomarker for Inflammation-Related Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- JMJD6 in tumor-associated macrophage regulates macrophage polarization and cancer progression via STAT3/IL-10 axis.Oncogene · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Jumonji domain-containing 6 (JMJD6) protein has been reported to be upregulated in different cancer cells; however, to the best of our knowledge, no report has analyzed serum anti-JMJD6 antibodies (s-JMJD6-Abs) in patients with cancer. Therefore, the present study evaluated the clinical significance of s-JMJD6-Abs in patients with colorectal cancer. Preoperative serum samples were analyzed from 167 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between April 2007 and May 2012. The pathological stages were as follows Stage I (n=47), stage II (n=56), stage III (n=49) and stage IV (n=15). In addition, 96 healthy participants were analyzed as controls. s-JMJD6-Abs were analyzed by amplified luminescent proximity homology assay-linked immunosorbent assay. The cutoff value of s-JMJD6-Abs for detecting colorectal cancer was calculated to be 5,720 using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The positive rate of s-JMJD6-Abs was 37% in patients with colorectal cancer (61 of 167), independent of carcinoembryonic antigen or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and p53-Abs. Clinicopathological factors and prognosis were compared between the s-JMJD6-Abs-positive group and the s-JMJD6-Abs-negative group. The s-JMJD6-Ab-positive status was significantly associated with older age (P=0.03), but was not associated with other clinicopathological variables. Regarding recurrence-free survival, the s-JMJD6-positive status was a significant poor prognostic factor in both univariate (P=0.02) and multivariate (P<0.01) analyses. Similarly, regarding overall survival, the s-JMJD6-Abs-positive status was a significant poor prognostic factor in both univariate (P=0.03) and multivariate (P=0.01) analyses. In conclusion, preoperative s-JMJD6-Abs was positive in 37% of patients with colorectal cancer and may be considered an independent poor prognostic biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.