ArticleJPRAS open2023
Techniques of inserting deep inferior epigastric perforator flap obliquely in immediate breast reconstruction after total mastectomy.
Article in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Influence of Inset and Shaping of Abdominal-Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction on Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcome Scores-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to share the experience of inserting a deep inferior epigastric perforator (D.I.E.P) flap obliquely in immediate breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. Method: Forty patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction with flap D.I.E.P after total mastectomy. The flaps were placed obliquely, with the upper edge facing downward and inward. After being placed in the recipient region, parts of the flap at both ends were removed, the upper end was fixed into the II-III intercostal space next to the sternum, and the lower end was folded to create a projection of the lateral lower pole of the breast. The flap pedicle was anastomosed to the thoracodorsal vessels (TDVs) if the contralateral flap pedicle was used; conversely, the mammary vessels (IMVs) were used. Satisfaction with breast shape was assessed after 6 months using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Results: A total of 37/40 flaps were well vascularized; 36/37 patients with a survival flap were interviewed, showing that the average BREAST-Q evaluation score of satisfaction with breast shape was 62.22 (51-78). The number of answers for satisfied and very satisfied with breast shape accounted for 94.44%. Conclusion: Inserting the D.I.E.P flap obliquely has the advantage of being easy to shape the breast contour, creating a moderate projection and symmetry to the opposite breast. The author suggested using the IMVs as the receiving vessels when using the pedicle of the flap on the ipsilateral side and the TDVs when the contralateral pedicle flap was used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.