ArticleJPRAS open2023
A Clinicopathological Classification Of Encephalocoeles Based On 207 Patients.
Article in JPRAS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Encephalocoeles are relatively rare congenital abnormalities. There have been a few classifications of encephalocoeles, but these are predominantly anatomical. A more clinical classification system would assist in planning treatment, surgical procedures and assessing outcomes. Materials and Methods: All encephalocoeles presenting at the Craniofacial Unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital were reviewed. There were 207 patients with 224 encephalocoeles. The clinical presentation and CT findings were analysed and used to group these encephalocoeles. Results: There were five distinct groups with some having subgroups.1.Cranial (n= 43). These were located on the calvarium and were subdivided into subgroups according to their anatomical location. They are occipital, parietal, frontal, temporal and acrania.2.Nasal (n= 122). These were located in the nasal region and were classified into two large subgroups (supranasal and infranasal) depending on whether the pathway and defect were above or below the nasal bones.3.Orbital (n= 21). These presented with the displacement of the globe and were subdivided into two subgroups: anterior and posterior.4.Basal (n= 11). The pathway of these encephalocoeles was through the floor of the anterior cranial fossa often with no visible deformity of the face.5.Cleft related (n= 27). The pathway of these encephalocoeles was through an existing craniofacial cleft. Conclusion: This classification system demonstrated good clinicopathological correlation. This allowed one to better appreciate the pathway and assess concomitant deformities. It also directed one to plan the procedure and detail the surgical corrections required to produce satisfactory outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.