Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844425›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023

Missing data in multi-omics integration: Recent advances through artificial intelligence.

Javier E Flores, Daniel M Claborne, Zachary D Weller, Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson, Katrina M Waters, Lisa M Bramer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Javier E FloresPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Richland, WA, United States.
Daniel M ClabornePacific Northwest National Laboratory, Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics Division, National Security Directorate, Richland, WA, United States.
Zachary D WellerPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics Division, National Security Directorate, Richland, WA, United States.
Bobbie-Jo M Webb-RobertsonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Richland, WA, United States.
Katrina M WatersPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Richland, WA, United States.
Lisa M BramerPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Biological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Richland, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems function through complex interactions between various 'omics (biomolecules), and a more complete understanding of these systems is only possible through an integrated, multi-omic perspective. This has presented the need for the development of integration approaches that are able to capture the complex, often non-linear, interactions that define these biological systems and are adapted to the challenges of combining the heterogenous data across 'omic views. A principal challenge to multi-omic integration is missing data because all biomolecules are not measured in all samples. Due to either cost, instrument sensitivity, or other experimental factors, data for a biological sample may be missing for one or more 'omic techologies. Recent methodological developments in artificial intelligence and statistical learning have greatly facilitated the analyses of multi-omics data, however many of these techniques assume access to completely observed data. A subset of these methods incorporate mechanisms for handling partially observed samples, and these methods are the focus of this review. We describe recently developed approaches, noting their primary use cases and highlighting each method's approach to handling missing data. We additionally provide an overview of the more traditional missing data workflows and their limitations; and we discuss potential avenues for further developments as well as how the missing data issue and its current solutions may generalize beyond the multi-omics context.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBayesiandata integrationmachine learningmissing datamulti-omicsmulti-viewneural networks

Identifiers

PMID36844425
PMCPMC9949722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.