Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844369›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

Extraction of clinical phenotypes for Alzheimer's disease dementia from clinical notes using natural language processing.

Inez Y Oh, Suzanne E Schindler, Nupur Ghoshal, Albert M Lai, Philip R O Payne, Aditi Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Home Health Care Patients at Risk for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inez Y OhInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-8710
Suzanne E SchindlerDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Nupur GhoshalDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Albert M LaiInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-2656
Philip R O PayneInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-2998
Aditi GuptaInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: There is much interest in utilizing clinical data for developing prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, progression, and outcomes. Existing studies have mostly utilized curated research registries, image analysis, and structured electronic health record (EHR) data. However, much critical information resides in relatively inaccessible unstructured clinical notes within the EHR. Materials and Methods: We developed a natural language processing (NLP)-based pipeline to extract AD-related clinical phenotypes, documenting strategies for success and assessing the utility of mining unstructured clinical notes. We evaluated the pipeline against gold-standard manual annotations performed by 2 clinical dementia experts for AD-related clinical phenotypes including medical comorbidities, biomarkers, neurobehavioral test scores, behavioral indicators of cognitive decline, family history, and neuroimaging findings. Results: Documentation rates for each phenotype varied in the structured versus unstructured EHR. Interannotator agreement was high (Cohen's kappa = 0.72-1) and positively correlated with the NLP-based phenotype extraction pipeline's performance (average F1-score = 0.65-0.99) for each phenotype. Discussion: We developed an automated NLP-based pipeline to extract informative phenotypes that may improve the performance of eventual machine learning predictive models for AD. In the process, we examined documentation practices for each phenotype relevant to the care of AD patients and identified factors for success. Conclusion: Success of our NLP-based phenotype extraction pipeline depended on domain-specific knowledge and focus on a specific clinical domain instead of maximizing generalizability.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseelectronic health recordsinformation retrievalnatural language processingroutinely collected health data

Identifiers

PMID36844369
PMCPMC9952043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.