Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844246›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2023

Formulation and evaluation of a bioink composed of alginate, gelatin, and nanocellulose for meniscal tissue engineering.

Julia Anna Semba, Adam Aron Mieloch, Ewa Tomaszewska, Piotr Cywoniuk, Jakub Dalibor Rybka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia Anna SembaCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Adam Aron MielochCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Ewa TomaszewskaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Piotr CywoniukCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
Jakub Dalibor RybkaCenter for Advanced Technology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1The necessity to preserve meniscal function prompts the research and development of novel treatment options, like three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. However, bioinks for meniscal 3D bioprinting have not been extensively explored. Therefore, in this study, a bioink composed of alginate, gelatin, and carboxymethylated cellulose nanocrystal (CCNC) was formulated and evaluated. Firstly, bioinks with varying concentrations of the aforementioned components were subjected to rheological analysis (amplitude sweep test, temperature sweep test, and rotation). The optimal bioink formulation of 4.0% gelatin, 0.75% alginate, and 1.4% CCNC dissolved in 4.6% D-mannitol was further used for printing accuracy analysis, followed by 3D bioprinting with normal human knee articular chondrocytes (NHAC-kn). The encapsulated cells' viability was > 98%, and collagen II expression was stimulated by the bioink. The formulated bioink is printable, stable under cell culture conditions, biocompatible, and able to maintain the native phenotype of chondrocytes. Aside from meniscal tissue bioprinting, it is believed that this bioink could serve as a basis for the development of bioinks for various tissues.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingAlginateBioinkCarboxymethylated cellulose nanocrystalGelatinMeniscus

Identifiers

PMID36844246
PMCPMC9947383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.