ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
A bibliometric analysis of 16,826 triple-negative breast cancer publications using multiple machine learning algorithms: Progress in the past 17 years.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Research on therapeutic clinical trials including immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Engineering smart polymeric lipid nanoparticles for breast cancer: AI-guided formulation design, biological barriers, and translational constraints.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Global research status and frontiers on autophagy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a comprehensive bibliometric and visualized analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in triple-negative breast cancer (2010-2024): a bibliometric analysis of global trends and clinical translation.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap: Scenario Planning for Science and Technology in Breast Cancer.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Research trends on AI in breast cancer diagnosis, and treatment over two decades.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- A bibliometric analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer: 1987-2024.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is proposed at the beginning of this century, which is still the most challenging breast cancer subtype due to its aggressive behavior, including early relapse, metastatic spread, and poor survival. This study uses machine learning methods to explore the current research status and deficiencies from a macro perspective on TNBC publications. Methods: PubMed publications under "triple-negative breast cancer" were searched and downloaded between January 2005 and 2022. R and Python extracted MeSH terms, geographic information, and other abstracts from metadata. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm was applied to identify specific research topics. The Louvain algorithm established a topic network, identifying the topic's relationship. Results: A total of 16,826 publications were identified, with an average annual growth rate of 74.7%. Ninety-eight countries and regions in the world participated in TNBC research. Molecular pathogenesis and medication are most studied in TNBC research. The publications mainly focused on three aspects: Therapeutic target research, Prognostic research, and Mechanism research. The algorithm and citation suggested that TNBC research is based on technology that advances TNBC subtyping, new drug development, and clinical trials. Conclusion: This study quantitatively analyzes the current status of TNBC research from a macro perspective and will aid in redirecting basic and clinical research toward a better outcome for TNBC. Therapeutic target research and Nanoparticle research are the present research focus. There may be a lack of research on TNBC from a patient perspective, health economics, and end-of-life care perspectives. The research direction of TNBC may require the intervention of new technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.