ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
Exploration of teaching practice of analgesia and sedation in mainland China: CASER experience.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Analgesia and sedation assessments vary widely in clinical performance. This study investigated the cognition of intensivist and the importance of training for analgesia and sedation through the Chinese Analgesia and Sedation Education & Research (CASER) group training program. Methods: A total of 107 participants studied the training courses on the "Sedation, Analgesia and Consciousness Assessment of Critically Ill Patients" held by CASER from June 2020 to June 2021. Ninety-eight valid questionnaires were recovered. The content of the questionnaire included the preface, general information of the trainees, students' awareness of the importance of analgesia and sedation evaluation and related guidelines, and professional test questions. Results: All respondents were senior professionals engaged in the ICU. A total of 92.86% believed that analgesia and sedation treatment were very important parts of the ICU, and 76.5% believed that they had mastered relevant professional knowledge. However, when evaluating the relevant professional theory and practice of the respondents from an objective point of view, it can be seen that only 28.57% of the respondents could reach the passing line in the specific case analysis scenario. Before participating in the training, 42.86% of the medical staff believed that analgesia and sedation treatment should be evaluated in the daily work of the ICU; after participating in the training, 62.24% of the medical staff believed that the evaluation was necessary and believed that they had improved after the training. Moreover, 69.4% of the respondents affirmed the necessity and significance of jointly undertaking the task of analgesia and sedation in Chinese ICUs. Conclusion: This study revealed that the assessment of analgesia and sedation is not standardized in the ICU in mainland China. The importance and significance of standardized training for analgesia and sedation are presented. The CASER working group thus established has a long way to go in its future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.