Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844173›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2022

Factor Structure of the Brief Addiction Monitor in a Non-Veteran Substance Use Disorder Outpatient Treatment Sample.

Jeremiah Schumm, Celeste Wong, Elisabeth Okrant, Jordan A Tharp, Jared Embree, Natalie Lester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Towards shortening the Brief Addiction Monitor-Revised (BAM-R).Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeremiah SchummSchool of Professional Psychology, College of Health, Education, and Human Services, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH, 45435.
Celeste WongVerily, LLC, 269 E Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA, 94080.
Elisabeth OkrantVerily, LLC, 269 E Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA, 94080.
Jordan A TharpVerily, LLC, 269 E Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA, 94080.
Jared EmbreeOneFifteen, Inc., 6636 Longshore St Suite 200, Dublin, OH, 43017.
Natalie LesterVerily, LLC, 269 E Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA, 94080.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) was developed as a comprehensive substance use disorder (SUD) outcome metric to fill a gap in quality measurement. Research to date has only examined the psychometric performance of this measure in veteran SUD populations. The purpose of the current research is to examine the factor structure and validity in a non-veteran SUD population. Methods: Non-veteran patients admitted to a SUD treatment program (N = 2,227) completed BAM at intake. After confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to evaluate the measurement model validity of previously defined latent structures, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess the factor structure and psychometric properties of the BAM within the full sample and within subgroups, specifically racial, referral source (mandated vs. not), and primary SUD diagnosis. Results: Exploratory factor analyses in the full sample supported a 4-factor model (representing Stressors, Alcohol Use, Risk Factors, and Protective Factors) derived from 13 items. Subsequent EFAs conducted separately in each subgroup revealed variability in the number of resulting factors and pattern matrices. The internal consistency also varied among factors and between subgroups; in general, reliability was greatest for the Alcohol Use scale and either poor or questionable for pattern matrices resulting in scales reflecting Risk or Protective Factors. Conclusion: Findings from our study suggest that the BAM might not be a reliable and valid instrument for all populations. More research is needed to develop and validate tools that are clinically meaningful and allow clinicians to track recovery progress over time.

Indexed as

factor analysissubstance use disorder, brief addiction monitor

Identifiers

PMID36844173
PMCPMC9948935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.