Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36844018›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2023

Disparities in spatial access to neurological care in Appalachia: a cross-sectional health services analysis.

R Blake Buchalter, Erik G Gentry, Mary A Willis, Marisa P McGinley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unique Health Care Delivery Considerations in Rural America.International journal of MS care · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Contextualizing Appalachian health needs.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Blake BuchalterDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Erik G GentryDepartment of Neurology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Mary A WillisDepartment of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Marisa P McGinleyMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002547 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DWEIK, RAED A. · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
Computational Genomic Epidemiology of Cancer (CoGEC) Training ProgramT32CA094186 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas Louis LaFramboise, Rong Xu · 2017 to 2026
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002547NCI NIH HHS T32 CA094186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Appalachia is rural and socioeconomically deprived with a heavy burden of neurological disorders and poor access to healthcare providers. Rates of neurological disorders are increasing over time without equal increases in providers, indicating that Appalachian disparities are likely to worsen. Spatial access to neurological care has not been robustly explored for U.S. areas, so we aimed to examine disparities in the vulnerable Appalachian region. Methods: Using 2022 CMS Care Compare physician data, we conducted a cross-sectional health services analysis, where we computed spatial accessibility of neurologists for all census tracts in the 13 states with Appalachian counties. We stratified access ratios by state, area deprivation, and rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes then utilized Welch two-sample t-tests to compare Appalachian tracts with non-Appalachian tracts. Using stratified results, we identified Appalachian areas where interventions would have the largest impact. Findings: Appalachian tracts (n = 6169) had neurologist spatial access ratios between 25% and 35% lower than non-Appalachian tracts (n = 18,441; p < 0.001). When stratified by rurality and deprivation, three-step floating catchment area spatial access ratios for Appalachian tracts remained significantly lower in the most urban (RUCA = 1 [p < 0.0001) and most rural tracts (RUCA = 9 [p = 0.0093]; RUCA = 10 [p = 0.0227]). We identified 937 Appalachian census tracts where interventions can be targeted. Interpretation: After stratifying by rural status and deprivation, significant disparities in spatial access to neurologists remained for Appalachian areas, indicating both poorer access in Appalachia and that neurologist accessibility cannot be determined solely by remoteness and socioeconomic status. These findings and our identified disparity areas have broad implications for policymaking and intervention targeting in Appalachia. Funding: R.B.B. was supported by NIH Award Number T32CA094186. M.P.M. was supported by NIH-NCATS Award Number KL2TR002547.

Indexed as

Appalachian health disparitiesFloating catchment areaNeurological careSpatial access to care

Identifiers

PMID36844018
PMCPMC9950666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.