ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023
A novel strategy for precise prognosis management and treatment option in colon adenocarcinoma with TP53 mutations.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High KPNA2 expression predicts poor prognosis in pathological T4 colorectal cancer by importing c-Myc into the nucleus to suppress p53-dependent p21 expression.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Potential mechanism ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Structure-Based Modeling of the Gut Bacteria-Host Interactome Through Statistical Analysis of Domain-Domain Associations Using Machine Learning.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: TP53 is one of the most frequent mutated genes in colon cancer. Although colon cancer with TP53 mutations has a high risk of metastasis and worse prognosis generally, it showed high heterogeneity clinically. Methods: A total of 1,412 colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) samples were obtained from two RNA-seq cohorts and three microarray cohorts, including the TCGA-COAD ( Results: A 16-gene prognostic signature was established in TP53-mutant COAD. The high-risk group had significantly inferior survival time compared to the low-risk group in all TP53-mutant datasets, while the prognostic signature failed to classify the prognosis of COAD with TP53 wild-type properly. Besides, the risk score was the independent poor factor for the prognosis in TP53-mutant COAD and the nomogram based on the risk score was also shown good predictive efficiency in TP53-mutant COAD. Moreover, we identified SGPP1, RHOQ, and PDGFRB as potential targets for TP53-mutant COAD, and illuminated that the high-risk patients might benefit from IGFR-3801, Staurosporine, and Sabutoclax. Conclusion: A novel prognostic signature with great efficiency was established especially for COAD patients with TP53 mutations. Besides, we identified novel therapeutic targets and potential sensitive agents for TP53-mutant COAD with high risk. Our findings provided not only a new strategy for prognosis management but also new clues for drug application and precision treatment in COAD with TP53 mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.