Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36843856›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

Consideration of compound drivers and impacts in the disaster risk reduction cycle.

Bart J J M van den Hurk, Christopher J White, Alexandre M Ramos, Philip J Ward, Olivia Martius, Indiana Olbert, Kathryn Roscoe, Henrique M D Goulart, Jakob Zscheischler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bart J J M van den HurkDeltares, Delft, the Netherlands.
Christopher J WhiteUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Alexandre M RamosInstitute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Philip J WardInstitute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Olivia MartiusInstitute of Geography and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern.
Indiana OlbertNational University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Kathryn RoscoeDeltares, Delft, the Netherlands.
Henrique M D GoulartDeltares, Delft, the Netherlands.
Jakob ZscheischlerDepartment of Computational Hydrosystems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consideration of compound drivers and impacts are often missing from applications within the Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) cycle, leading to poorer understanding of risk and benefits of actions. The need to include compound considerations is known, but lack of guidance is prohibiting practitioners from including these considerations. This article makes a step toward practitioner guidance by providing examples where consideration of compound drivers, hazards, and impacts may affect different application domains within disaster risk management. We discern five DRR categories and provide illustrative examples of studies that highlight the role of "compound thinking" in early warning, emergency response, infrastructure management, long-term planning, and capacity building. We conclude with a number of common elements that may contribute to the development of practical guidelines to develop appropriate applications for risk management.

Indexed as

Decision scienceEarth sciencesSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID36843856
PMCPMC9947303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.