ArticleCureus2023
Incidence and Risk Factors of Spinal Anesthesia-Related Complications After an Elective Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of analgesic effects between programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion after cesarean section: a randomized controlled study.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Prevalence and factors associated with hypotension after spinal anesthesia during cesarean section at public hospitals in Harar town, Eastern Ethiopia.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Prediction of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- A Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Older Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarean section: emerging techniques and evidence-based strategies - a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Exploring Variability in Spinal Anesthesia Levels Achieved During Cesarean Section Deliveries: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Hypotension in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section with Spinal Anaesthesia at Muhimbili National Hospital.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
- Risk prediction score for high spinal block in patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study.Local and regional anesthesia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Neuraxial anesthetic techniques are the method of choice for cesarean section (CS) deliveries, and spinal anesthesia (SA) is the preferred technique. Although the use of SA has greatly improved the outcomes of CS deliveries, SA-related complications are still a matter of concern. The study's primary aim is to measure the incidence of SA complications after a CS, specifically hypotension, bradycardia, and prolonged recovery, as well as to identify the risk factors for these complications. Method The data of patients who had elective CS using SA from January 2019 to December 2020 was collected from a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study design was a retrospective cohort study. The data collected included age, BMI, gestational age, comorbidities, the SA drug and dosage used, the site of the spinal puncture, and the patient's position during the spinal block. Also, the patient's blood pressure measurements, heart rate, and oxygen saturation levels were collected at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Results The incidence of mild, moderate, and severe hypotension was 31.4%, 23.9%, and 30.1%, respectively. In addition, 15.1% of the patients experienced bradycardia, with 37.4% experiencing a prolonged recovery. Two factors were associated with hypotension, including BMI and the dosage of the SA, with a p-value of 0.008 and a p-value of 0.009, respectively. The site of the SA punctures equal to or lower than L2 was the only factor associated with bradycardia (p-value = 0.043). Conclusion The present study concludes that BMI and the dose of SA were the factors associated with SA-induced hypotension during a CS, and the site of the SA puncture equal to or lower than L2 was the only risk factor associated with spinal anesthesia-induced bradycardia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.