Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36843245›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2023

The invisible work of transfer centre nurses: A qualitative study of strategies to overcome communication challenges.

Megan C Saucke, Esra Alagoz, Natalia Arroyo, Diana E Gutierrez-Meza, Sara Fernandes-Taylor, Angela M Ingraham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan C SauckeDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5133-5295
Esra AlagozDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7046-006X
Natalia ArroyoDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-0227
Diana E Gutierrez-MezaDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Sara Fernandes-TaylorDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0007-0677
Angela M IngrahamDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-7324

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
A Critical Assessment of and Opportunities for Improvement in the Interhospital Transfer of Emergency General Surgery patientsK08HS025224 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI INGRAHAM, ANGELA M · 2018 to 2022
$788k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS025224NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore the role of transfer centre nurses and how they facilitate communication between referring and accepting providers during calls about interhospital transfers, including their strategies to overcome communication challenges.

designA qualitative interview study.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 transfer centre nurses at one tertiary medical centre from March to August 2019, asking participants to describe their work. We performed content analysis, applying codes based on the Relational Coordination Framework and generating emergent codes, then organized codes in higher-order concepts. We followed the COREQ checklist.

resultsTransfer centre nurses employed multiple strategies to mitigate communication challenges. When referring providers had misconceptions about the transfer centre nurse's role and the accepting hospital's processes, the nurses informed referring providers why sharing information with them was necessary. If providers expressed frustrations or lacked understanding about their counterpart's caseload, the nurses managed providers' emotions by letting them "vent," explaining the other provider's situational context and describing the hospital's capabilities. Some nurses also mediated conflict and sought to break the tension if providers debated about the best course of action. When providers struggled to share complete and accurate information, the nurses hunted down details and 'filled in the blanks'.

conclusionTransfer centre nurses perform invisible work throughout the lifespan of interhospital transfers. Nurses' expert knowledge of the transfer process and hospitals' capabilities can enhance provider communication. Meanwhile, providers' lack of knowledge of the nurse's role can impede respectful and efficient transfer conversations. Interventions to support and optimize the transfer centre nurses' critical work are needed. IMPACT: This study describes how transfer centre nurses facilitate communication and overcome challenges during calls about interhospital transfers. An intervention that supports this critical work has the potential to benefit nurses, providers and patients by ensuring accurate and complete information exchange in an effective, efficient manner that respects all parties. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study was designed to capture the perspectives and experiences of transfer centre nurses themselves through interviews. Therefore, it was not conducted using input or suggestions from the public or the patient population served by the organization.

Indexed as

CommunicationNursesHospitalsHumansNurse's RoleQualitative Researchcommunicationdelivery of healthcaregeneral surgeryinterprofessional relationsnursesnurse's rolepatient transferqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36843245
PMCPMC10293039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.