Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36843229›Full record

ArticleOecologia2023

Trophic ontogeny of a generalist predator is conserved across space.

Christopher D Stallings, James A Nelson, Ernst B Peebles, Gregory Ellis, Ethan A Goddard, Nathaniel K Jue, Alejandra Mickle, Orian E Tzadik, Christopher C Koenig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher D StallingsCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA. stallings@usf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3410-4540
James A NelsonDepartment of Biology, University of Louisiana Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, USA.
Ernst B PeeblesCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Gregory EllisCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Ethan A GoddardCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Nathaniel K JueDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, California State University, Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, USA.
Alejandra MickleDepartment of Biology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Orian E TzadikCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Christopher C KoenigCoastal and Marine Laboratory, Florida State University, St. Teresa, FL, USA.
University of South Florida St. Petersburg · USFlorida State University · USCalifornia State University, Monterey Bay · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Louisiana at Lafayette · US

Funding

National Marine Fisheries Service NA04NMF4540213National Marine Fisheries Service NA08NMF4270414National Marine Fisheries Service NA11NMF4330123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers can influence ecological patterns and processes through their trophic roles and contributions to the flow of energy through ecosystems. However, the diet and associated trophic roles of consumers commonly change during ontogeny. Despite the prevalence of ontogenetic variation in trophic roles of most animals, we lack an understanding of whether they change consistently across local populations and broad geographic gradients. We examined how the diet and trophic position of a generalist marine predator varied with ontogeny across seven broadly separated locations (~ 750 km). We observed a high degree of heterogeneity in prey consumed without evidence of spatial structuring in this variability. However, compound-specific isotope analysis of amino acids revealed remarkably consistent patterns of increasing trophic position through ontogeny across local populations, suggesting that the roles of this generalist predator scaled with its body size across space. Given the high degree of diet heterogeneity we observed, this finding suggests that even though the dietary patterns differed, the underlying food web architecture transcended variation in prey species across locations for this generalist consumer. Our research addresses a gap in empirical field work regarding the interplay between stage-structured populations and food webs, and suggests ontogenetic changes in trophic position can be consistent in generalist consumers.

Indexed as

EcosystemFood ChainAnimalsBody SizeDietNutritional StatusBiochemical markersIndividual variationMacroecologyOntogenetic niche shiftOptimal foragingSeagrass

Identifiers

PMID36843229
OpenAlexW4322207911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.