ArticleThoracic cancer2023
Efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients after drug resistance.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase II trial of anlotinib plus EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with gradual, oligo, or potential progression after EGFR-TKIs treatment (CTONG-1803/ALTER-L001).Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Trial
- Restoring osimertinib sensitivity in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: the role of anlotinib in modulating Wnt/β-catenin/YAP pathways.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Anlotinib enhances the anti-tumor activity of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer by reversing drug resistance.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- A predictive model for anlotinib-osimertinib efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with acquired resistance: circulating tumor DNA and angiogenesis markers.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Genetic mutation profiling reveals biomarkers for targeted therapy efficacy and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients after drug resistance.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with anlotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after drug resistance, and to explore the related factors affecting the efficacy.
methodsThe clinical data of 34 patients with advanced NSCLC who received osimertinib combined with anlotinib as three or more lines of treatment in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from June 2019 to March 2022 were collected, and the therapeutic efficacy and safety were analyzed.
resultsA total of 34 advanced NSCLC patients met the inclusion criteria. The objective response rate was 20.6%, the disease response rate was 88.2%, the median overall survival was 19.0 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6.0 months. The common adverse events were mainly grade 1-2, and only three cases (11.1%) of adverse events were grade 3, including hypertension, proteinuria, and vomiting. No grade 4 or above adverse events were observed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score and bone metastasis were independent prognostic factors for osimertinib combined with anlotinib as three or more lines of treatment in advanced NSCLC.
conclusionsOsimertinib combined with anlotinib as three or more lines of treatment in advanced NSCLC was effective and adverse events were tolerable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.