ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2023
Diagnostic challenges of renal medullary carcinoma and the role for cytologic assessment: Case report and literature review.
Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating between renal medullary and clear cell renal carcinoma with a machine learning radiomics approach.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Diagnostic challenges of renal medullary carcinoma and the role for cytologic assessment: Case report and literature review.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a diagnostically challenging, aggressive primary renal malignancy associated with abysmal survival. Delays in diagnosis contribute to most patients having diffusely metastatic disease at the time of initial presentation.
methodsWe present the case of a 13-year-old African American male with sickle cell trait who presented with a renal mass and hematuria. Evaluation included imaging, fluid cultures, and cytologic assessment.
resultsPatient was diagnosed with RMC based on cytologic assessment of sub-centimeter fluid collections aspirated from the left kidney at the time of cortical biopsy for suspected renal mass. The additional fluid aspiration in conjunction with renal biopsy was an atypical but crucial step in early diagnosis.
conclusionCytomorphologic evaluation of fluid biospecimens is not currently part of the standard work-up for patients with renal masses but, when available, can provide crucial information that reduces time to diagnosis. Prompt symptom recognition and treatment initiation may improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.