ArticleRespiratory research2023
Benchmarking omics-based prediction of asthma development in children.
Article in Respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence aware feature selection improves biomarker identification in microbiome studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- PEARL: integrative multi-omics classification and omics feature discovery via deep graph learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Current understanding and future directions in severe asthma through artificial intelligence-integrated multi-omic approaches.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs as Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers in Childhood Asthma: A Systematic Review with Bioinformatics Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond the Usual Suspects: Unmasking Low-T2 Asthma in Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Developing a prediction model for persistent airflow limitation in asthmatic children.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in pediatric allergy research.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- The application of multi-omics in the respiratory microbiome: Progresses, challenges and promises.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsthma is a heterogeneous disease with high morbidity. Advancement in high-throughput multi-omics approaches has enabled the collection of molecular assessments at different layers, providing a complementary perspective of complex diseases. Numerous computational methods have been developed for the omics-based patient classification or disease outcome prediction. Yet, a systematic benchmarking of those methods using various combinations of omics data for the prediction of asthma development is still lacking.
objectiveWe aimed to investigate the computational methods in disease status prediction using multi-omics data.
methodWe systematically benchmarked 18 computational methods using all the 63 combinations of six omics data (GWAS, miRNA, mRNA, microbiome, metabolome, DNA methylation) collected in The Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART) cohort. We evaluated each method using standard performance metrics for each of the 63 omics combinations.
resultsOur results indicate that overall Logistic Regression, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and MOGONET display superior performance, and the combination of transcriptional, genomic and microbiome data achieves the best prediction. Moreover, we find that including the clinical data can further improve the prediction performance for some but not all the omics combinations.
conclusionsSpecific omics combinations can reach the optimal prediction of asthma development in children. And certain computational methods showed superior performance than other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.