Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36842533›Full record

ArticleChest2023

Patenting Strategies on Inhaler Delivery Devices.

Brandon J Demkowicz, S Sean Tu, Aaron S Kesselheim, Michael A Carrier, William B Feldman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Real-World Use of Inhaled COPD Medications: the Good, the Bad, the Ugly.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Brandon J DemkowiczHarvard University; Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
S Sean TuWest Virginia University College of Law.
Aaron S KesselheimProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School.
Michael A CarrierRutgers Law School.
William B FeldmanProgram on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School. Electronic address: wbfeldman@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USRutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights · NLWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Improving COPD Outcomes: Using Real-World Data to Analyze Treatment Effectiveness, Safety, and AdherenceK08HL163246 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI William Brand Feldman · 2023 to 2026
$643k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL163246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with asthma and COPD rely on inhalers to control symptoms. Yet, these products remain expensive, in part because brand-name manufacturers have obtained numerous patents on inhalers, including on their delivery devices. Recent antitrust litigation has raised questions about the boundaries of listing device patents with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), particularly when patents do not claim any active ingredients. RESEARCH QUESTION: How have manufacturers relied on device patents to preserve market exclusivity on brand-name inhalers? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe identified patents on brand-name inhalers approved for asthma and COPD between 1986 and 2020 using the FDA's Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Orange Book). We extracted information about patents from LexisNexis TotalPatent One and Google Patents and searched device patents for mention of active ingredients or other prespecified features linking the patent to the relevant drug. For each inhaler, we determined the duration of protection added by device patents.

resultsThe FDA approved 53 brand-name inhalers for asthma and COPD from 1986 through 2020, 39 of which had at least one device patent. One hundred thirty-seven distinct device patents were in the final cohort, representing 49% of all patents listed on inhalers. Seventy-seven percent of device patents made no mention of active ingredients or their molecular structures, and 72% made no mention of any relevant prespecified feature connecting the device patent to the drug product. For the 39 brand-name inhalers with one or more device patents listed in the Orange Book, device patents extended the duration of market protection by a median of 5.5 years (interquartile range, 0.0-10.5 years) beyond the last-to-expire nondevice patent.

interpretationPatent and regulatory reform is needed to promote generic competition and to ensure that patients with asthma and COPD have access to affordable medications.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDrug IndustryHumansNebulizers and VaporizersPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationsantitrust lawasthmaCOPDFood and Drug Administrationinhalerspatents

Identifiers

PMID36842533
PMCPMC10475818
OpenAlexW4321769499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.