Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36842522›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Less is more: balancing noise reduction and data retention in fMRI with data-driven scrubbing.

Damon Đ Phạm, Daniel J McDonald, Lei Ding, Mary Beth Nebel, Amanda F Mejia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex-Based Mechanisms of Stress-Induced Alcohol-Seeking.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Infants: Insights From More Than 750 Scanning Sessions.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Damon Đ PhạmDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. Electronic address: damondpham@gmail.com.
Daniel J McDonaldDepartment of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lei DingDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Mary Beth NebelCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amanda F MejiaDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Bayesian methods for cortical surface neuroimaging dataR01EB027119 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MEJIA, AMANDA · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Visual-Motor Development in Infants at High Risk for AutismK01MH109766 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI NEBEL, MARY BETH · 2016 to 2020
$753k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027119NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH109766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) data may be contaminated by artifacts arising from a myriad of sources, including subject head motion, respiration, heartbeat, scanner drift, and thermal noise. These artifacts cause deviations from common distributional assumptions, introduce spatial and temporal outliers, and reduce the signal-to-noise ratio of the data-all of which can have negative consequences for the accuracy and power of downstream statistical analysis. Scrubbing is a technique for excluding fMRI volumes thought to be contaminated by artifacts and generally comes in two flavors. Motion scrubbing based on subject head motion-derived measures is popular but suffers from a number of drawbacks, among them the need to choose a threshold, a lack of generalizability to multiband acquisitions, and high rates of censoring of individual volumes and entire subjects. Alternatively, data-driven scrubbing methods like DVARS are based on observed noise in the processed fMRI timeseries and may avoid some of these issues. Here we propose "projection scrubbing", a novel data-driven scrubbing method based on a statistical outlier detection framework and strategic dimension reduction, including independent component analysis (ICA), to isolate artifactual variation. We undertake a comprehensive comparison of motion scrubbing with data-driven projection scrubbing and DVARS. We argue that an appropriate metric for the success of scrubbing is maximal data retention subject to reasonable performance on typical benchmarks such as the validity, reliability, and identifiability of functional connectivity. We find that stringent motion scrubbing yields worsened validity, worsened reliability, and produced small improvements to fingerprinting. Meanwhile, data-driven scrubbing methods tend to yield greater improvements to fingerprinting while not generally worsening validity or reliability. Importantly, however, data-driven scrubbing excludes a fraction of the number of volumes or entire sessions compared to motion scrubbing. The ability of data-driven fMRI scrubbing to improve data retention without negatively impacting the quality of downstream analysis has major implications for sample sizes in population neuroscience research.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsBrainBrain MappingHumansMotionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36842522
PMCPMC10773988
OpenAlexW4321760707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.