ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2023
Application of Machine learning to predict RF heating of cardiac leads during magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T: A simulation study.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-induced heating of elongated conductive implants, such as leads in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, is essential to assessing patient safety. Phantom experiments have traditionally been used to estimate radio-frequency (RF) heating of implants, but they are time-consuming. Recently, machine learning has shown promise for fast prediction of RF heating of orthopaedic implants when the implant position within the MRI RF coil was predetermined. We explored whether deep learning could be applied to predict RF heating of conductive leads with variable positions and orientations during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T. Models of 600 cardiac leads with clinically relevant trajectories were generated, and electromagnetic simulations were performed to calculate the maximum of the 1 g-averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of RF energy at the tips of lead models during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T. Neural networks were trained to predict the maximum SAR at the lead tip from the knowledge of the coordinates of points along the lead trajectory. Despite the large range of SAR values (∼230 W/kg to ∼ 3200 W/kg and ∼ 10 W/kg to ∼ 3300 W/kg), the root- mean-square error of the predicted vs ground truth SAR remained at 223 W/kg and 206 W/kg, with the R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.