Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36842083›Full record

ArticleCell reports2023

Molecular basis for differential activation of p101 and p84 complexes of PI3Kγ by Ras and GPCRs.

Manoj K Rathinaswamy, Meredith L Jenkins, Benjamin R Duewell, Xuxiao Zhang, Noah J Harris, John T Evans, Jordan T B Stariha, Udit Dalwadi, Kaelin D Fleming, Harish Ranga-Prasad and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. NovelGenes & diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Manoj K RathinaswamyDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Meredith L JenkinsDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Benjamin R DuewellDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA; Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Xuxiao ZhangMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Noah J HarrisDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
John T EvansDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Jordan T B StarihaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Udit DalwadiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Kaelin D FlemingDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Harish Ranga-PrasadDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Calvin K YipDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Roger L WilliamsMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Scott D HansenDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA; Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA. Electronic address: shansen5@uoregon.edu.
John E BurkeDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. Electronic address: jeburke@uvic.ca.
University of Victoria · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBOregon Research Institute · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
Cancer Research UK DRCPGM\100014CIHR FDN-143228Medical Research Council MC_U105184308NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Class IB phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3Kγ) is activated in immune cells and can form two distinct complexes (p110γ-p84 and p110γ-p101), which are differentially activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and Ras. Using a combination of X-ray crystallography, hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS), electron microscopy, molecular modeling, single-molecule imaging, and activity assays, we identify molecular differences between p110γ-p84 and p110γ-p101 that explain their differential membrane recruitment and activation by Ras and GPCRs. The p110γ-p84 complex is dynamic compared with p110γ-p101. While p110γ-p101 is robustly recruited by Gβγ subunits, p110γ-p84 is weakly recruited to membranes by Gβγ subunits alone and requires recruitment by Ras to allow for Gβγ activation. We mapped two distinct Gβγ interfaces on p101 and the p110γ helical domain, with differences in the C-terminal domain of p84 and p101 conferring sensitivity of p110γ-p101 to Gβγ activation. Overall, our work provides key insight into the molecular basis for how PI3Kγ complexes are activated.

Indexed as

Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesSignal TransductionModels, MolecularPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinaseReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledCP: Cell biologyGPCRHDX-MSp101p84phosphoinositide 3-kinasePI3KPIK3CGPIK3R5PIK3R6TIRF

Identifiers

PMID36842083
PMCPMC10068899
OpenAlexW4322154690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.