Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841972›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2023

Assessing the Suitability of Unmet Need as a Proxy for Access to Contraception and Desire to Use It.

Leigh Senderowicz, Brooke W Bullington, Nathalie Sawadogo, Katherine Tumlinson, Ana Langer, Abdramane Soura, Pascal Zabré, Ali Sié

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Contraceptive Concordance.Studies in family planning · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Relationship Dynamics and Young Women's Contraceptive Use.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leigh SenderowiczDepartment of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6713-1473
Brooke W BullingtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Nathalie SawadogoInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph Ki-ZERBO, 03 BP 7021, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.
Katherine TumlinsonCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8314-8219
Ana LangerDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Abdramane SouraInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph Ki-ZERBO, 03 BP 7021, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso.
Pascal ZabréCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
Ali SiéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso.

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Center for Demography and EcologyR24HD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RAYMO, JAMES M · 2004 to 2013
$7.2M
Health Disparities Research Scholars Training Program-RenewalT32HD049302 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Maureen S Durkin · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Training Program in Reproductive, Perinatal, and Pediatric EpidemiologyT32HD052468 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Julie L Daniels · 2008 to 2026
$3.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047873NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049302NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD052468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmet need for contraception is a widely used but frequently misunderstood indicator. Although calculated from measures of pregnancy intention and current contraceptive use, unmet need is commonly used as a proxy measure for (1) lack of access to contraception and (2) desire to use it. Using data from a survey in Burkina Faso, we examine the extent to which unmet need corresponds with and diverges from these two concepts, calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values. Among women assigned conventional unmet need, 67 percent report no desire to use contraception and 61 percent report access to a broad range of affordable contraceptives. Results show unmet need has low sensitivity and specificity in differentiating those who lack access and/or who desire to use a method from those who do not. These findings suggest that unmet need is of limited utility to inform family planning programs and may be leading stakeholders to overestimate the proportion of women in need of expanded family planning services. We conclude that more direct measures are feasible at the population level, rendering the proxy measure of unmet need unnecessary. Where access to and/or desire for contraception are the true outcomes of interest, more direct measures should be used.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancyContraceptive AgentsaccessBurkina Fasocontraceptionfamily planningmeasurementsexual and reproductive health and rightssub-Saharan AfricaUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID36841972
PMCPMC10257191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.