Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841900›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2023

Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers.

Vidar Andersen, Espen Hermans, Vegard Vereide, Nicolay Stien, Gøran Paulsen, Jiří Baláš, Michail Lubomirov Michailov, Helene Pedersen, Atle Hole Saeterbakken

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vidar AndersenFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway. vidar.andersen@hvl.no.
Espen HermansFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.
Vegard VereideFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.
Nicolay StienFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.
Gøran PaulsenFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.
Jiří BalášFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Michail Lubomirov MichailovDepartment Theory and Methodology of Sports Training, National Sports Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Helene PedersenFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.
Atle Hole SaeterbakkenFaculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BFR at 40% of MVC (Low + BFR) in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Rate of perceived exertion for effort (RPE) and discomfort (RPD), session pleasure/displeasure (sPDF), exercise enjoyment (EES), lactate concentration and oxygen saturation were recorded after the last set. Both low-intensity sessions induced higher RPD than High (p = 0.018-0.022, ES = 1.01-1.09) and High was perceived as more enjoyable than Low-BFR (p = 0.031, ES = 1.08). No differences were found for RPE or sPDF (p = 0.132-0.804). Lactate was elevated more after High than the Low-sessions (p < 0.001, ES = 1.88-2.08). Capillary oxygen saturation was lower after Low + BFR compared to the other sessions (p = 0.031, ES = 1.04-1.27). Finally, the exercise volume was greater in Low compared to High (p = 0.022, ES = 1.14) and Low + BFR (p = 0.020, ES = 0.77). In conclusion, among advanced male climbers, performing Low + BFR led to a similar exercise volume but was perceived as more discomforting and less enjoyable compared to High. The Low session yielded similar responses as the Low + BFR but required a much greater exercise volume.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingHumansLactic AcidMaleMuscle, SkeletalPhysical ExertionRegional Blood FlowLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID36841900
PMCPMC9968301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.