Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841895›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023

Cost-Utility Analysis of Deep Learning and Trained Human Graders for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in a Nationwide Program.

Attasit Srisubat, Kankamon Kittrongsiri, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Chalida Khemvaranan, Jacqueline Baras Shreibati, Jack Ching, John Hernandez, Richa Tiwari, Fred Hersch, Yun Liu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Attasit SrisubatDepartment of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Kankamon KittrongsiriSocial, Economic and Administrative Pharmacy (SEAP) Graduate Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sermsiri SangroongruangsriSocial and Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. ningsermsiri@gmail.com.
Chalida KhemvarananDepartment of Research and Technology Assessment, Lerdsin Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jacqueline Baras ShreibatiGoogle LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Jack ChingGoogle LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA.
John HernandezGoogle LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Richa TiwariGoogle LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Fred HerschGoogle LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Yun LiuGoogle LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Prut HanutsahaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Varis RuamviboonsukDepartment of Biochemistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saowalak TurongkaraveeSocial and Administrative Pharmacy Division, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rajiv RamanSri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Paisan RuamviboonsukDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand. paisan.trs@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6114-6220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDeep learning (DL) for screening diabetic retinopathy (DR) has the potential to address limited healthcare resources by enabling expanded access to healthcare. However, there is still limited health economic evaluation, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, on this subject to aid decision-making for DL adoption.

methodsIn the context of a middle-income country (MIC), using Thailand as a model, we constructed a decision tree-Markov hybrid model to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes of Thailand's national DR screening program via DL and trained human graders (HG). We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the two strategies. Sensitivity analyses were performed to probe the influence of modeling parameters.

resultsFrom a societal perspective, screening with DL was associated with a reduction in costs of ~ US$ 2.70, similar quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) of + 0.0043, and an incremental net monetary benefit of ~ US$ 24.10 in the base case. In sensitivity analysis, DL remained cost-effective even with a price increase from US$ 1.00 to US$ 4.00 per patient at a Thai willingness-to-pay threshold of ~ US$ 4.997 per QALY gained. When further incorporating recent findings suggesting improved compliance to treatment referral with DL, our analysis models effectiveness benefits of ~ US$ 20 to US$ 50 depending on compliance.

conclusionDR screening using DL in an MIC using Thailand as a model may result in societal cost-savings and similar health outcomes compared with HG. This study may provide an economic rationale to expand DL-based DR screening in MICs as an alternative solution for limited availability of skilled human resources for primary screening, particularly in MICs with similar prevalence of diabetes and low compliance to referrals for treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCost-utility analysisDiabetic retinopathyHealth economicsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36841895
PMCPMC10011252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.