ReviewCell death discovery2023
The mechanism of programmed death and endoplasmic reticulum stress in pulmonary hypertension.
Review in Cell death discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-Delivery of Ferrostatin-1 and M2 Macrophage-Derived Exosomal Signals via Engineered Hybrid Nanovesicles Enables Synergistic Neuroprotection in Traumatic Brain Injury.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic potential of E-selectin in pulmonary arterial hypertension.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- NF-κB signaling as a critical inflammatory node in pulmonary arterial hypertension: from vascular remodeling to right heart failure.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Design Strategies and Applications of Engineered Nanoparticles for Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- New insights into pulmonary arterial hypertension: interaction between PANoptosis and perivascular inflammatory responses.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025Review
- Life-threatening risk factors contribute to the development of diseases with the highest mortality through the induction of regulated necrotic cell death.Cell death & disease · 2025Review
- CC chemokines Modulate Immune responses in Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- Targeting pyroptosis with nanoparticles to alleviate neuroinflammatory for preventing secondary damage following traumatic brain injury.Science advances · 2024Article
- Pulmonary hypertension and insulin resistance: a mechanistic overview.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) was a cardiovascular disease with high morbidity and mortality. PH was a chronic disease with complicated pathogenesis and uncontrollable factors. PH was divided into five groups according to its pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. Although the treatment and diagnosis of PH has made great progress in the past ten years. However, the diagnosis and prognosis of the PAH had a great contrast, which was not conducive to the diagnosis and treatment of PH. If not treated properly, it will lead to right ventricular failure or even death. Therefore, it was necessary to explore the pathogenesis of PH. The problem we urgently need to solve was to find and develop drugs for the treatment of PH. We reviewed the PH articles in the past 10 years or so as well as systematically summarized the recent advance. We summarized the latest research on the key regulatory factors (pyroptosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, and endoplasmic reticulum stress) involved in PH. To provide theoretical basis and basis for finding new therapeutic targets and research directions of PH.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.