Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841598›Full record

ReviewPediatric clinics of North America2023

Clinician Communication to Address Vaccine Hesitancy.

Douglas J Opel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric clinics of North America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Douglas J OpelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, M/S: JMB-6, 1900 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. Electronic address: douglas.opel@seattlechildrens.org.

Funding

Evaluation of the Presumptively Initiating Vaccines and Optimizing Talk with Motivational Interviewing (PIVOT with MI) InterventionR01HD093628 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI O'LEARY, SEAN T, OPEL, DOUGLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Increasing Child Immunization Rates via Improved Provider-Parent CommunicationK23HD069467 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI OPEL, DOUGLAS J · 2011 to 2015
$650k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD069467NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several factors that influence childhood vaccine uptake. Pediatric clinicians play a particularly influential role in parent vaccine decision-making. It is critical therefore that pediatric clinicians have a "communication toolbox"--a set of effective, evidence-based communication strategies to facilitate uptake of childhood vaccines--that they can use in conversations with parents about vaccines. In this article, recent advances in our understanding of what constitutes effective clinician vaccine communication with parents are discussed.

Indexed as

VaccinationVaccinesChildCommunicationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccination HesitancyVaccinesChildHealth communicationPreventive health servicesVaccine

Identifiers

PMID36841598
PMCPMC11531800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.