Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841594›Full record

ReviewPediatric clinics of North America2023

Maternal Vaccination and Vaccine Hesitancy.

Cynthia M Rand, Courtney Olson-Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric clinics of North America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pandemic Pregnancy Experiences and Risk Mitigation Behaviors: COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Enhancing Tdap vaccine uptake: key insights for Filipino maternal health.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cynthia M RandDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 777, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Electronic address: cynthia_rand@urmc.rochester.edu.
Courtney Olson-ChenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 668, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommends influenza vaccine annually, Tdap with each pregnancy, and COVID-19 vaccine for those not previously vaccinated or who are due for boosters. The influenza and COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy and are effective in reducing morbidity in both the pregnant person and infant. The Tdap vaccine is given primarily to protect the newborn from pertussis through transplacental antibody transfer. Methods to enhance vaccination rates include stocking and giving vaccines in the obstetric office, recommending eligible vaccines at each visit, and focusing on the health of the infant in conversations with patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccineInfluenza vaccinePrenatal careTdap vaccineVaccinationVaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36841594
PMCPMC9956150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.