Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36841093›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2023

Predicted utility modulates working memory fidelity in the brain.

Emily J Levin, James A Brissenden, Alexander Fengler, David Badre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Trying Harder: How Cognitive Effort Sculpts Neural Representations during Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily J LevinDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, USA; University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, USA. Electronic address: eml179@pitt.edu.
James A BrissendenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Alexander FenglerDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, USA.
David BadreDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, USA; Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, USA.

Funding

The organization of neural representations for flexible behavior in the human brainR01MH125497 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Neural dynamics of human working memory networksR01MH111737 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
NIH HHS S10 OD025181NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111737NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The predicted utility of information stored in working memory (WM) is hypothesized to influence the strategic allocation of WM resources. Prior work has shown that when information is prioritized, it is remembered with greater precision relative to other remembered items. However, these paradigms often complicate interpretation of the effects of predicted utility on item fidelity due to a concurrent memory load. Likewise, no fMRI studies have examined whether the predicted utility of an item modulates fidelity in the neural representation of items during the memory delay without a concurrent load. In the current study, we used fMRI to investigate whether predicted utility influences fidelity of WM representations in the brain. Using a generative model multivoxel analysis approach to estimate the quality of remembered representations across predicted utility conditions, we observed that items with greater predicted utility are maintained in memory with greater fidelity, even when they are the only item being maintained. Further, we found that this pattern follows a parametric relationship where more predicted utility corresponded to greater fidelity. These precision differences could not be accounted for based on a redistribution of resources among already-remembered items. Rather, we interpret these results in terms of a gating mechanism that allows for pre-allocation of resources based on predicted value alone. This evidence supports a theoretical distinction between resource allocation that occurs as a result of load and resource pre-allocation that occurs as a result of predicted utility.

Indexed as

BrainMemory, Short-TermAttentionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMental RecallFidelityfMRIGatingPredicted utilityWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID36841093
PMCPMC10023440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.