Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36840954›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2023

Examining US commercial health plans' use of The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's reports in specialty drug coverage decisions.

James D Chambers, Daniel E Enright, Ari D Panzer, Josh T Cohen, Daniel A Ollendorf, Peter J Neumann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Use of clinical outcome assessments in specialty drug coverage policies.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  3. Derivation of a South African tariff for the EQ-5D-5L using a personal utility function approach.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Cost-Effectiveness of Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab for First-Line Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the United States.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James D ChambersThe Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Daniel E EnrightThe Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Ari D PanzerThe Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Josh T CohenThe Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Daniel A OllendorfThe Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Peter J NeumannThe Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Tufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36840954
PMCPMC10387943
OpenAlexW4321996613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.