Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36840867›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2023

Prognostic models in COVID-19 infection that predict severity: a systematic review.

Chepkoech Buttia, Erand Llanaj, Hamidreza Raeisi-Dehkordi, Lum Kastrati, Mojgan Amiri, Renald Meçani, Petek Eylul Taneri, Sergio Alejandro Gómez Ochoa, Peter Francis Raguindin, Faina Wehrli and 14 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Predictor Composition, Outcomes, Risk of Bias, and Validation of COVID-19 Prognostic Scores.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Risk model derivation and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia patients discharged from the emergency department.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Chepkoech Buttia *Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. Jackiebuttia07@yahoo.com.
Erand LlanajDepartment of Molecular Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Hamidreza Raeisi-Dehkordi *Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lum Kastrati *Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Mojgan AmiriDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Renald MeçaniDepartment of Pediatrics, "Mother Teresa" University Hospital Center, Tirana, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania.
Petek Eylul TaneriInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sergio Alejandro Gómez OchoaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter Francis RaguindinInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Faina WehrliInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Farnaz KhatamiInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Octavio Pano EspínolaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lyda Z RojasResearch Group and Development of Nursing Knowledge (GIDCEN-FCV), Research Center, Cardiovascular Foundation of Colombia, Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia.
Aurélie Pahud de MortangesFaculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Eric Francis Macharia-NimietzThoracic Surgery Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Fadi AlijlaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Beatrice MinderPublic Health and Primary Care Library, University Library of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexander B LeichtleUniversity Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (CAIM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nora LüthiEmergency Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Simone EhrhardEmergency Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Yok-Ai QueDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Laurenz Kopp FernandesDeutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (DHZB), Berlin, Germany.
Wolf Hautz *Emergency Department, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16C, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Taulant Muka *Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Horizon 2020 101017915Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung #320030_176216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence on COVID-19 prognostic models is inconsistent and clinical applicability remains controversial. We performed a systematic review to summarize and critically appraise the available studies that have developed, assessed and/or validated prognostic models of COVID-19 predicting health outcomes. We searched six bibliographic databases to identify published articles that investigated univariable and multivariable prognostic models predicting adverse outcomes in adult COVID-19 patients, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation, high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and mortality. We identified and assessed 314 eligible articles from more than 40 countries, with 152 of these studies presenting mortality, 66 progression to severe or critical illness, 35 mortality and ICU admission combined, 17 ICU admission only, while the remaining 44 studies reported prediction models for mechanical ventilation (MV) or a combination of multiple outcomes. The sample size of included studies varied from 11 to 7,704,171 participants, with a mean age ranging from 18 to 93 years. There were 353 prognostic models investigated, with area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.44 to 0.99. A great proportion of studies (61.5%, 193 out of 314) performed internal or external validation or replication. In 312 (99.4%) studies, prognostic models were reported to be at high risk of bias due to uncertainties and challenges surrounding methodological rigor, sampling, handling of missing data, failure to deal with overfitting and heterogeneous definitions of COVID-19 and severity outcomes. While several clinical prognostic models for COVID-19 have been described in the literature, they are limited in generalizability and/or applicability due to deficiencies in addressing fundamental statistical and methodological concerns. Future large, multi-centric and well-designed prognostic prospective studies are needed to clarify remaining uncertainties.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical CareHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedPrognosisYoung AdultBiomarkersCOVID-19ICUMortalityPrediction modelsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36840867
PMCPMC9958330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.