Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36840814›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2023

Revisiting Polarity Indeterminacy of ICA-Decomposed ERPs and Scalp Topographies.

Masaki Nakanishi, Makoto Miyakoshi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masaki NakanishiSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Makoto MiyakoshiSwartz Center for Computational Neuroscience, Institute for Neural Computation, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA. Makoto.Miyakoshi@cchmc.org.

Funding

EEGLAB: Software for Analysis of Human Brain DynamicsR01NS047293 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Arnaud Delorme, Scott Makeig · 2004 to 2026
$10.2M
National Science Foundation 2011716NINDS NIH HHS 5R01NS047293-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose an alternative method to align the polarities of independent components (ICs) for group-level IC cluster analysis. Current methods are presently limited in how indeterminacy of IC polarities is handled, as when multiplying a weight matrix to a time-series IC activation, the result from 1 × 1 and - 1 × - 1 are indistinguishable. We first clarify the EEGLAB's default solution and define it as the iterative correlation maximization as it maximizes the within-cluster correlations of the IC scalp topographies to the cluster mean. We then propose the covariance maximization method, which determines the polarity of ICs based on the sign of the largest eigenvalue of covariance matrix. We compared the two methods on datasets from a published visual event-related potential (ERP) study. The results were similar when both methods were applied to the IC scalp topographies. However, when the proposed method was applied to IC ERPs, the number of clusters that showed significant ERP amplitudes increased from 5 to 9 out of 9 due to minimization of within-cluster ERP amplitude cancellation. Our study confirm covariance maximization provides an alternative solution to post-ICA group-level analysis that can maximize sensitivity of IC ERPs.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyScalpCluster AnalysisEvoked PotentialsHumansTime FactorsCovariance maximizationElectroencephalographyEvent-related potentialIndependent component analysisPolarity indeterminacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.