ArticleBrain topography2023
Revisiting Polarity Indeterminacy of ICA-Decomposed ERPs and Scalp Topographies.
Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EPAT: a user-friendly MATLAB toolbox for EEG/ERP data processing and analysis.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- One out of ten independent components shows flipped polarity with poorer data quality: EEG database study.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose an alternative method to align the polarities of independent components (ICs) for group-level IC cluster analysis. Current methods are presently limited in how indeterminacy of IC polarities is handled, as when multiplying a weight matrix to a time-series IC activation, the result from 1 × 1 and - 1 × - 1 are indistinguishable. We first clarify the EEGLAB's default solution and define it as the iterative correlation maximization as it maximizes the within-cluster correlations of the IC scalp topographies to the cluster mean. We then propose the covariance maximization method, which determines the polarity of ICs based on the sign of the largest eigenvalue of covariance matrix. We compared the two methods on datasets from a published visual event-related potential (ERP) study. The results were similar when both methods were applied to the IC scalp topographies. However, when the proposed method was applied to IC ERPs, the number of clusters that showed significant ERP amplitudes increased from 5 to 9 out of 9 due to minimization of within-cluster ERP amplitude cancellation. Our study confirm covariance maximization provides an alternative solution to post-ICA group-level analysis that can maximize sensitivity of IC ERPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36840814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.