ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2023
Improved Genomic Prediction of Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolation Sources with a Novel Polygenic Score.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screen for signatures of positive selection in the core genome ofMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis infections can be challenging to diagnose due to the species frequent contamination of clinical specimens and indolent course of infection. Nevertheless, S. epidermidis is the major cause of late-onset sepsis among premature infants and of intravascular infection in all age groups. Prior work has shown that bacterial virulence factors, antimicrobial resistances, and strains have up to 80% in-sample accuracy to distinguish hospital from community sources, but are unable to distinguish true bacteremia from blood culture contamination. Here, a phylogeny-informed genome-wide association study of 88 isolates was used to estimate effect sizes of particular genomic variants for isolation sources. A "polygenic score" was calculated for each isolate as the summed effect sizes of its repertoire of genomic variants. Predictive models of isolation sources based on polygenic scores were tested with in-samples and out-samples from prior studies of different patient populations. Polygenic scores from accessory genes (AGs) distinguished hospital from community sources with the highest accuracy to date, up to 98% for in-samples and 65% to 91% for various out-samples, whereas scores from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) had lower accuracy. Scores from AGs and SNPs achieved the highest in-sample accuracy to date, up to 76%, in distinguishing infection from contaminant sources within a hospital. Model training and testing data sets with more similar population structures resulted in more accurate predictions. This study reports the first use of a polygenic score for predicting a complex bacterial phenotype and shows the potential of this approach for enhancing S. epidermidis diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.