Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36840468›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation

Lvzhong Hu, Jinhua Zhou, Zhisong He, Lin Zhang, Fangzhou Du, Mengting Nie, Yao Zhou, Hang Hao, Lixing Zhang, Shuang Yu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lvzhong HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2760-8871
Jinhua ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhisong HeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Fangzhou DuSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Mengting NieSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Yao ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hang HaoSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Lixing ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Shuang YuSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Jingzhong ZhangSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Youguo ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Soochow University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNXuzhou Medical College · CNChangchun University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healing of full-thickness skin wounds remains a major challenge. Recently, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) were shown to possess an extraordinary potential to promote skin repair in clinical settings. However, their low survival rate after transplantation limits their therapeutic efficiency in treating full-thickness skin wounds. Hydrogels are considered an ideal cell transplantation vector owing to their three-dimensional mesh structure, good biosafety, and biodegradation. The objective of this study was to investigate the skin wound healing effect of a fibrin hydrogel scaffold loaded with hUC-MSCs. We found that the fibrin hydrogel had a three-dimensional mesh structure and low cytotoxicity and could prolong the time of cell survival in the peri-wound area. The number of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled hUC-MSCs was higher in the full-thickness skin wound of mice treated with hydrogel-hUC-MSCs than those of mice treated with cell monotherapy. In addition, the combination therapy between the hydrogel and hUC-MSCs speed up wound closure, its wound healing rate was significantly higher than those of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) therapy, hydrogel monotherapy, and hUC-MSCs monotherapy. Furthermore, the results showed that the combination therapy between hydrogel and hUC-MSCs increased keratin 10 and keratin 14 immunofluorescence staining, and upregulated the relative gene expressions of epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), promoting epithelial regeneration and angiogenesis. In conclusion, the fibrin hydrogel scaffold provides a relatively stable sterile environment for cell adhesion, proliferation, and migration, and prolongs cell survival at the wound site. The hydrogel-hUC-MSCs combination therapy promotes wound closure, re-epithelialization, and neovascularization. It exhibits a remarkable therapeutic effect, being more effective than the monotherapy with hUC-MSCs or hydrogel.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound HealingAnimalsHumansHydrogelsMiceTissue ScaffoldsUmbilical CordVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AHydrogelsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Afibrinhuman umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cellshydrogelskin wound healing

Identifiers

PMID36840468
PMCPMC9969468
OpenAlexW4321997021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.