Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36840363›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2023

Nano-biotechnology in tumour and cancerous disease: A perspective review.

Ambikesh Soni, Manohar Prasad Bhandari, Gagan Kant Tripathi, Priyavand Bundela, Pradeep Kumar Khiriya, Purnima Swarup Khare, Manoj Kumar Kashyap, Abhijit Dey, Balachandar Vellingiri, Suresh Sundaramurthy and 2 more

Open access · goldFull text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Nano-biotechnology in tumour and cancerous disease: A perspective review.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Ambikesh SoniSchool of Nanotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India.
Manohar Prasad BhandariInstitute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Gagan Kant TripathiSchool of Nanotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India.
Priyavand BundelaSchool of Nanotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India.
Pradeep Kumar KhiriyaSchool of Nanotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India.
Purnima Swarup KhareSchool of Nanotechnology, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, India.
Manoj Kumar KashyapAmity Stem Cell Institute, Amity Medical School, Amity University Haryana, Haryana, India.
Abhijit DeyDepartment of Life Sciences, Presidency University, West Bengal, Kolkata, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5750-0802
Balachandar VellingiriStem cell and Regenerative Medicine/Translational Research, Department of Zoology, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bathinda, India.
Suresh SundaramurthyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1424-9259
Arisutha SureshDepartment of Energy, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology & M/s Eco Science & Technology, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, India.
José M Pérez de la LastraBiotecnología de macromoléculas, Instituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología, (IPNA-CSIC), San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4663-5565
Rajiv Gandhi Technical University · INMaulana Azad National Institute of Technology · INAmity University · AECentral University of Punjab · INInstituto de Productos Naturales y Agrobiología · ESPresidency University · INUniversity of Latvia · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, drug manufacturers and researchers have begun to consider the nanobiotechnology approach to improve the drug delivery system for tumour and cancer diseases. In this article, we review current strategies to improve tumour and cancer drug delivery, which mainly focuses on sustaining biocompatibility, biodistribution, and active targeting. The conventional therapy using cornerstone drugs such as fludarabine, cisplatin etoposide, and paclitaxel has its own challenges especially not being able to discriminate between tumour versus normal cells which eventually led to toxicity and side effects in the patients. In contrast to the conventional approach, nanoparticle-based drug delivery provides target-specific delivery and controlled release of the drug, which provides a better therapeutic window for treatment options by focusing on the eradication of diseased cells via active targeting and sparing normal cells via passive targeting. Additionally, treatment of tumours associated with the brain is hampered by the impermeability of the blood-brain barriers to the drugs, which eventually led to poor survival in the patients. Nanoparticle-based therapy offers superior delivery of drugs to the target by breaching the blood-brain barriers. Herein, we provide an overview of the properties of nanoparticles that are crucial for nanotechnology applications. We address the potential future applications of nanobiotechnology targeting specific or desired areas. In particular, the use of nanomaterials, biostructures, and drug delivery methods for the targeted treatment of tumours and cancer are explored.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNanoparticlesNeoplasmsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanotechnologyTissue DistributionAntineoplastic Agentsdendrimersdrug deliverygold nanoparticlesnano-biotechnologysilver nanoparticlestumour

Identifiers

PMID36840363
PMCPMC10002932
OpenAlexW4321996752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.