Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36840219›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Optimization of Molecular Methods for Detecting Duckweed-Associated Bacteria.

Kenneth Acosta, Shawn Sorrels, William Chrisler, Weijuan Huang, Sarah Gilbert, Thomas Brinkman, Todd P Michael, Sarah L Lebeis, Eric Lam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Correlation betweenFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Duckweed: Research Meets Applications.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenneth AcostaDepartment of Plant Biology, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5309-2760
Shawn SorrelsDepartment of Plant Biology, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3007-1048
William ChrislerEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA 99354, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3829-2454
Weijuan HuangInstitute of Nanfan & Seed Industry, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510316, China.
Sarah GilbertDepartment of Plant Biology, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3458-1347
Thomas BrinkmanDepartment of Plant Biology, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Todd P MichaelThe Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6272-2875
Sarah L LebeisDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0269-3192
Eric LamDepartment of Plant Biology, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USGuangdong Academy of Sciences · CNMichigan State University · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

United States Department of Energy DE-SC0018244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial colonization dynamics of plants can differ between phylogenetically similar bacterial strains and in the context of complex bacterial communities. Quantitative methods that can resolve closely related bacteria within complex communities can lead to a better understanding of plant-microbe interactions. However, current methods often lack the specificity to differentiate phylogenetically similar bacterial strains. In this study, we describe molecular strategies to study duckweed-associated bacteria. We first systematically optimized a bead-beating protocol to co-isolate nucleic acids simultaneously from duckweed and bacteria. We then developed a generic fingerprinting assay to detect bacteria present in duckweed samples. To detect specific duckweed-bacterium associations, we developed a genomics-based computational pipeline to generate bacterial strain-specific primers. These strain-specific primers differentiated bacterial strains from the same genus and enabled the detection of specific duckweed-bacterium associations present in a community context. Moreover, we used these strain-specific primers to quantify the bacterial colonization of duckweed by normalization to a plant reference gene and revealed differences in colonization levels between strains from the same genus. Lastly, confocal microscopy of inoculated duckweed further supported our PCR results and showed bacterial colonization of the duckweed root-frond interface and root interior. The molecular methods introduced in this work should enable the tracking and quantification of specific plant-microbe associations within plant-microbial communities.

Indexed as

Azospirillum brasilense Sp245Azospirillum brasilense Sp7bacterial colonizationbead-beatingduckweedduckweed-associated bacteriaplant-bacteria associationsplant-microbe interactionsRISAstrain-specific primers

Identifiers

PMID36840219
PMCPMC9965182
OpenAlexW4320917714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.