ReviewPharmaceutics2023
Experimental Methods for the Biological Evaluation of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Risks.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterial-Based Therapeutic Delivery: Integrating Redox Biology, Genetic Engineering, and Imaging-Guided Treatment.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smart integrated biomaterial systems for precision and optimized delivery of MSCs and their exosomes: Transforming wound healing and organ regeneration.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Hesperidin and Its Polylactic-ACS omega · 2025Article
- Treatment of ovarian cancer: From the past to the new era (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Nanoparticles in Antibacterial Therapy: A Systematic Review of Enhanced Efficacy against Intracellular Bacteria.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Current and Near-Future Technologies to Quantify Nanoparticle Therapeutic Loading Efficiency and Surface Coating Efficiency with Targeted Moieties.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How Advanced are Self-Assembled Nanomaterials for Targeted Drug Delivery? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- pH-sensitive Silk Fibroin Nanoparticles Encapsulating β-Hydroxyisovalerylshikonin for Targeted Pancreatic Cancer Therapy.Current drug delivery · 2025Article
- Synergistic enhancement of low-dose radiation therapy via cuproptosis and metabolic reprogramming for radiosensitization in in situ hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- A Novel Delivery System for the Combined Use of Natural Ingredients: The Preparation of Berberine Hydrochloride-Matrine Liposomes and Preliminary Exploration of Their Anti-Tumor Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nanosuspension-Loaded Dissolving Microneedle Patches for Enhanced Transdermal Delivery of a Highly Lipophilic Cannabidiol.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Article
- A Novel Experimental Approach to Understand the Transport of Nanodrugs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many novel medical therapies use nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, including nanomaterials through drug delivery systems, diagnostics, or physiologically active medicinal products. The approval of nanoparticles with advanced therapeutic and diagnostic potentials for applications in medication and immunization depends strongly on their synthesizing procedure, efficiency of functionalization, and biological safety and biocompatibility. Nanoparticle biodistribution, absorption, bioavailability, passage across biological barriers, and biodistribution are frequently assessed using bespoke and biological models. These methods largely rely on in vitro cell-based evaluations that cannot predict the complexity involved in preclinical and clinical studies. Therefore, assessing the nanoparticle risk has to involve pharmacokinetics, organ toxicity, and drug interactions manifested at multiple cellular levels. At the same time, there is a need for novel approaches to examine nanoparticle safety risks due to increased constraints on animal exploitation and the demand for high-throughput testing. We focus here on biological evaluation methodologies that provide access to nanoparticle interactions with the organism (positive or negative via toxicity). This work aimed to provide a perception regarding the risks associated with the utilization of nanoparticle-based formulations with a particular focus on assays applied to assess the cytotoxicity of nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.