Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839856›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

Hydroxychloroquine Enhances Cytotoxic Properties of Extracellular Vesicles and Extracellular Vesicle-Mimetic Nanovesicles Loaded with Chemotherapeutics.

Sergey Brezgin, Anastasiya Kostyusheva, Natalia Ponomareva, Ekaterina Bayurova, Alla Kondrashova, Anastasia Frolova, Olga Slatinskaya, Landysh Fatkhutdinova, Georgy Maksimov, Mikhail Zyuzin and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Biologics-based technologies for highly efficient and targeted RNA delivery.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergey BrezginLaboratory of Genetic Technologies, Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-0739
Anastasiya KostyushevaLaboratory of Genetic Technologies, Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia PonomarevaLaboratory of Genetic Technologies, Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina BayurovaChumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immunobiological Products, Russian Academy of Sciences (Polio Institute), 108819 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6160-2203
Alla KondrashovaChumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immunobiological Products, Russian Academy of Sciences (Polio Institute), 108819 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-6909
Anastasia FrolovaDivision of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sochi, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6980-0028
Olga SlatinskayaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9908-2637
Landysh FatkhutdinovaSchool of Physics, ITMO University, Lomonosova 9, 191002 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Georgy MaksimovFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-0773
Mikhail ZyuzinSchool of Physics, ITMO University, Lomonosova 9, 191002 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5364-2635
Ilya GordeychukChumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immunobiological Products, Russian Academy of Sciences (Polio Institute), 108819 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4551-7535
Alexander LukashevLaboratory of Genetic Technologies, Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey MakarovSchool of Physics, ITMO University, Lomonosova 9, 191002 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander IvanovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5659-9679
Andrey A ZamyatninDivision of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sochi, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-4565
Vladimir ChulanovLaboratory of Genetic Technologies, Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6303-9293
Alessandro ParodiDivision of Biotechnology, Sirius University of Science and Technology, 354340 Sochi, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0985-6545
Dmitry KostyushevLaboratory of Genetic Technologies, Martsinovsky Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1851-7441
Sechenov University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RUITMO University · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUHarbin Engineering University · CNSirius University of Science and Technology · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 21-75-30020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of their high biocompatibility, biological barrier negotiation, and functionalization properties, biological nanoparticles have been actively investigated for many medical applications. Biological nanoparticles, including natural extracellular vesicles (EVs) and synthetic extracellular vesicle-mimetic nanovesicles (EMNVs), represent novel drug delivery vehicles that can accommodate different payloads. In this study, we investigated the physical, biological, and delivery properties of EVs and EMNVs and analyzed their ability to deliver the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. EMNVs and EVs exhibit similar properties, but EMNVs are more effectively internalized, while EVs show higher intracellular doxorubicin release activity. In addition, these nanotherapeutics were investigated in combination with the FDA-approved drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). We demonstrate that HCQ-induced lysosome destabilization and could significantly increase nanoparticle internalization, doxorubicin release, and cytotoxicity. Altogether, these data demonstrate that, from the delivery standpoint in vitro, the internalization of EMNVs and EVs and their payload release were slightly different and both nanotherapeutics had comparable cytotoxic performance. However, the synthesis of EMNVs was significantly faster and cost-effective. In addition, we highlight the benefits of combining biological nanoparticles with the lysosome-destabilizing agent HCQ that increased both the internalization and the cytotoxic properties of the particles.

Indexed as

doxorubicindrug deliveryendosomal escapeexosomesextruded nanoparticlesextrusionhydroxychloroquinelysosomotropic agentnanomedicineproteolipid nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID36839856
PMCPMC9962585
OpenAlexW4319317541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.