Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839840›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

Perceived Usability of Tablet Crushers: Comparison of Devices by People with and without Limited Hand Functions.

Su Vin Lee, Tammy Aplin, Aida Sefidani Forough, Kathryn J Steadman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Su Vin LeeSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7624-2861
Tammy AplinSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Aida Sefidani ForoughSchool of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Kathryn J SteadmanSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-330X
The University of Queensland · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tablet crushing is a common practice used by patients and their carers, mainly to facilitate swallowing. Various tablet-crushing devices with different designs are currently available on the market. This study aimed to compare the usability of different tablet-crushing devices in people with and without limited hand functions. The hand function of 100 adults recruited from the general community (40 of whom self-reported a limited hand function) was assessed using the hand and finger function subscale of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale version 2. The hand strength was measured using a dynamometer. Participants crushed tablets using 11 crushing devices and completed a Rapid Assessment of Product Usability and Universal Design questionnaire for each device. Hand-held twist-action crushers with an ergonomic grip received the highest usability scores among both groups, irrespective of the cost (

Indexed as

dosage form modificationhand functionhand strengthpill crusherswallowing difficulties

Identifiers

PMID36839840
PMCPMC9961238
OpenAlexW4319317050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.