Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839835›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

Quality by Design (QbD) Approach for a Nanoparticulate Imiquimod Formulation as an Investigational Medicinal Product.

Jonas Pielenhofer, Sophie Luise Meiser, Karsten Gogoll, Anna-Maria Ciciliani, Mark Denny, Michael Klak, Berenice M Lang, Petra Staubach, Stephan Grabbe, Hansjörg Schild and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonas PielenhoferDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-1855
Sophie Luise MeiserDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Karsten GogollDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Anna-Maria CicilianiDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Mark DennyDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Michael KlakDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Berenice M LangDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Petra StaubachDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Stephan GrabbeDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6863-8719
Hansjörg SchildInstitute for Immunology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Markus P Radsak3rd Department Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3991-5721
Hilde Spahn-LangguthDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Peter LangguthDepartment for Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Project number 213555243Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR 156-KS01RMU Initiative Project Körpereigene Barrieren
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present article exemplifies the application of the concept of quality by design (QbD) for the systematic development of a nanoparticulate imiquimod (IMQ) emulsion gel formulation as an investigational medicinal product (IMP) for evaluation in an academic phase-I/II clinical trial for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK) against the comparator Aldara (EudraCT: 2015-002203-28). The design of the QbD elements of a quality target product profile (QTPP) enables the identification of the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the drug product as the content of IMQ, the particle-size distribution, the pH, the rheological properties, the permeation rate and the chemical, physical and microbiological stability. Critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) are identified by using a risk-based approach in an Ishikawa diagram and in a risk-estimation matrix. In this study, the identified CPPs of the wet media ball-milling process's milling time and milling speed are evaluated in a central composite design of experiments (DoEs) approach, revealing criticality for both factors for the resulting mean particle size, while only the milling time is significantly affecting the polydispersity. To achieve a mean particle size in the range of 300-400 nm with a minimal PdI, the optimal process conditions are found to be 650 rpm for 135 min. Validating the model reveals a good correlation between the predicted and observed values. Adequate control strategies were implemented for intermediate products as in-process controls (IPCs) and quality control (QC) tests of the identified CQAs. The IPC and QC data from 13 "IMI-Gel" batches manufactured in adherence to good manufacturing practice (GMP) reveal consistent quality with minimal batch-to-batch variability.

Indexed as

critical quality attributesdesign of experimentsGMPIMI-Gelnanoparticlesquality target product profile

Identifiers

PMID36839835
PMCPMC9965879
OpenAlexW4319081556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.