Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839752›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

CSM-Toxin: A Web-Server for Predicting Protein Toxicity.

Vladimir Morozov, Carlos H M Rodrigues, David B Ascher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A large language model for predicting neurotoxic peptides and neurotoxins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vladimir MorozovSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6722-8646
Carlos H M RodriguesSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4420-6401
David B AscherSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-2413

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1174405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologics are one of the most rapidly expanding classes of therapeutics, but can be associated with a range of toxic properties. In small-molecule drug development, early identification of potential toxicity led to a significant reduction in clinical trial failures, however we currently lack robust qualitative rules or predictive tools for peptide- and protein-based biologics. To address this, we have manually curated the largest set of high-quality experimental data on peptide and protein toxicities, and developed CSM-Toxin, a novel in-silico protein toxicity classifier, which relies solely on the protein primary sequence. Our approach encodes the protein sequence information using a deep learning natural languages model to understand "biological" language, where residues are treated as words and protein sequences as sentences. The CSM-Toxin was able to accurately identify peptides and proteins with potential toxicity, achieving an MCC of up to 0.66 across both cross-validation and multiple non-redundant blind tests, outperforming other methods and highlighting the robust and generalisable performance of our model. We strongly believe the CSM-Toxin will serve as a valuable platform to minimise potential toxicity in the biologic development pipeline. Our method is freely available as an easy-to-use webserver.

Indexed as

deep-learningprotein toxicitysequence

Identifiers

PMID36839752
PMCPMC9966851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.