Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839660›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2023

Advances in the Physico-Chemical, Antimicrobial and Angiogenic Properties of Graphene-Oxide/Cellulose Nanocomposites for Wound Healing.

Ugo D'Amora, Sawsan Dacrory, Mohamed Sayed Hasanin, Angela Longo, Alessandra Soriente, Samir Kamel, Maria Grazia Raucci, Luigi Ambrosio, Stefania Scialla

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Graphene Oxide: Preparation and Medical Research.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Synthesis of Graphene@CPharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Recent Insights into Nanotechnology in Colorectal Cancer.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ugo D'AmoraInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6142-059X
Sawsan DacroryCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Cairo 12622, Egypt.
Mohamed Sayed HasaninCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Cairo 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-3594-5322
Angela LongoInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4952-0600
Alessandra SorienteInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), 80125 Naples, Italy.
Samir KamelCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Cairo 12622, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7971-4318
Maria Grazia RaucciInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-4181
Luigi AmbrosioInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), 80125 Naples, Italy.
Stefania SciallaInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council (IPCB-CNR), 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7884-0443
National Research Council · ITNational Research Centre · EG

Funding

National Research Council CUP B65F22000050005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) and its reduced form (rGO) have recently attracted a fascinating interest due to their physico-chemical properties, which have opened up new and interesting opportunities in a wide range of biomedical applications, such as wound healing. It is worth noting that GO and rGO may offer a convenient access to its ready dispersion within various polymeric matrices (such as cellulose and its derivative forms), owing to their large surface area, based on a carbon skeleton with many functional groups (i.e., hydroxyl, carboxyl, epoxy bridge, and carbonyl moieties). This results in new synergic properties due to the presence of both components (GO or rGO and polymers), acting at different length-scales. Furthermore, they have shown efficient antimicrobial and angiogenic properties, mostly related to the intracellular formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are advantageous in wound care management. For this reason, GO or rGO integration in cellulose-based matrixes have allowed for designing highly advanced multifunctional hybrid nanocomposites with tailored properties. The current review aims to discuss a potential relationship between structural and physico-chemical properties (i.e., size, edge density, surface chemistry, hydrophilicity) of the nanocomposites with antimicrobials and angiogenic mechanisms that synergically influence the wound healing phenomenon, by paying particular attention to recent findings of GO or rGO/cellulose nanocomposites. Accordingly, after providing a general overview of cellulose and its derivatives, the production methods used for GO and rGO synthesis, the mechanisms that guide antimicrobial and angiogenic processes of tissue repair, as well as the most recent and remarkable outcomes on GO/cellulose scaffolds in wound healing applications, will be presented.

Indexed as

angiogenesisantimicrobialcellulosegraphene oxidewound healing

Identifiers

PMID36839660
PMCPMC9961167
OpenAlexW4317505582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.